<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reviews itemIdentifier="BetterHo1935">
  <review review_id="996">
    <review_id>996</review_id>
    <reviewbody>Back in 1935, and when homes cost 25.62 a month in mortgage, this film was made to entice home builders and buyers to stimulate the housing market from the doldrums the past 5 years, Part 1 deals with the sudden increase in building, and how it helps joe worker, who might not have worked in years.&#13;
Part 2 is signifigantly more interesting, We follow a recently married couple as they look in on a model home. They're all marvelling over the nice fixtures and furniture (maybe I'm wrong, but was the furniture included in the house price in those days? Because the couple seemed to fall in love with the furniture). They quickly look at the nursery "but that's not needed..... YET". lol. Soon they leave. it's too bad they can't afford it, the narrator says, ah but wait, the house costs 4800 dollars, with 960 dollars down and 27.62 a month mortgage! WOW.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Need a house?</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Spuzz</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2003-01-16 20:32:28</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2003-01-16 20:32:28</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="5407">
    <review_id>5407</review_id>
    <reviewbody>A couple of short, government-sponsored newsreel clips showing how the New Deal is creating more housing and more jobs in building new houses. Construction workers are put back to work building new houses as part of a government-sponsored program, and a middle-class couple inspects a model home, now made affordable by National Housing Administration mortgages. The first scene is pretty standard, and the second is mildly cute. A fun little piece of 30s history.&#13;
Ratings: Camp/Humor Value: ***. Weirdness: **. Historical Interest: ****. Overall Rating: ***.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Better Housing News Flashes</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Christine Hennig</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2003-07-28 19:09:18</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2003-07-28 19:09:18</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="10279">
    <review_id>10279</review_id>
    <reviewbody>A 1935 film about government sponsored housing construction through the National Housing Act. Imagine the government putting people to work for the common good! We dont see much of that today. We see a couple touring a model house. Its a small Mock-Tudor and their expectations are touchingly modest. The dining room is small but adequate for their moderate entertaining. Shes impressed by the flat-top stove and the sturdy built-in ironing board in the kitchen, not to mention the handy cabinets. Too bad they cant afford it . . . But maybe they can! If they qualify for a government sponsored mortgage, that is. Low as the payments for this house may look to us today, it was probably still out of reach of most families during the Depression.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Idle Hands Put To Work</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Marysz</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2004-03-09 20:33:20</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2004-03-09 20:33:20</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="13950">
    <review_id>13950</review_id>
    <reviewbody>June 2004 marks the 70th anniversary of the start of the Federal Housing Administration, and the Better Housing movies provide a good visual explanation of the origins of these then revolutionary home programs. The short model home tour provides more than a few laughs, as well as stereotypical images of family roles, and the virtual absence of minority families. &#13;
&#13;
Thankfully, there have been a lot of changes in the country since the time these shorts were shot (FHA is now a leader nationally in providing loans to minority first time homebuyers) but the desire for homeownership remains at least as strong amongst new generations of Americans as it was when these shorts were shot. &#13;
&#13;
Mega credit to Rick Prelinger for these and many other materials in the archive. (I have an earlier Laser Disc with some of these materials that Rick produced and rediscovering these and other archival material on line has been a real treat).&#13;
&#13;
From Tom Cusack [These are my personal comments made from home over the Memorial Day weekend, but as a matter of full disclosure I have worked for HUD for 31 years, and now serve as HUD Director [parent agency for FHA home loan programs]in Oregon]</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Better Housing and FHA 70th Anniversary June 2004</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Tom , Oregon</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2004-06-03 21:10:30</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2004-05-29 14:47:42</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>June 27, 2009 marks the 75th anniversary, so this is an update on my review from 5 years ago. I have uploaded a permanent PDF which will be updated several times during June 2009 HERE:&#13;
&#13;
http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/fha75thanniversarycelebration.pdf&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
I have ALSO posted a video of the first FHA home loan in Oregon,(Astoria, 1935) HERE:&#13;
 &#13;
http://www.archive.org/details/FirstFhaHomeLoanInOregonInAstoria1935&#13;
&#13;
If anyone had told me that we would be facing in 2009 the same kinds of depression era declines in housing activity and hoped for recovery that this film highlights, I would have thought they were crazy. &#13;
&#13;
With the demise of so many other home loan programs, FHA remains as one of the few remaining loan programs that continues to operate. I only hope that FHA has implemented enough safeguards to insure that the program remains viable 75 (or 5) years from now.&#13;
&#13;
Tom Cusack&#13;
Oregon Housing Blog&#13;
www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Past is Prologue : FHA's 75th Anniversary June 27, 2009</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Housepdx.com</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2009-06-05 18:44:56</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2009-04-01 21:28:12</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>of radio fame, is the narrator.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Harry von Zell</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>paulwl</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2009-07-28 23:16:24</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2009-07-28 23:14:51</createdate>
    <stars>0</stars>
  </review>
  <info>
    <num_reviews>6</num_reviews>
    <avg_rating>4.20</avg_rating>
  </info>
</reviews>
